NOTE Swift 3.1 appears to break nested bindings as shown in this example. The initial binding works, but reassigning the root variable triggers an exception. Binding directly to root properties (e.g. "heading" vs. "content.heading") still seems to work fine.

MVVM ("model/view/view-model") is design pattern that helps promote a separation of concerns in software development. It is an extension of the well-known "model/view/controller" (MVC) pattern that is often used in user interface design.

In a traditional MVC application, a "controller" object is used to mediate interaction between two other objects known as the "model" and the "view". The model is an abstract representation of data managed by the application, and the view is a visual representation of the data contained in the model. The controller notifies the view of changes to the model, and updates the model in response to user input events received from the view.

MVVM expands on MVC by further decoupling the view from the controller. Instead of requiring the controller to explicitly manage the view's state, a view in an MVVM application uses data binding to be automatically updated in response to changes in a "view model" object exposed by the controller. This object adapts the data provided by the underlying model so that it can be easily consumed by the view. The additional level of indirection allows the view and controller to vary independently without the risk of breaking one or the other.

MVC Example

For example, consider a simple custom table view cell implemented using MVC:

The cell class might provide a set of outlets that the table view controller can use to update its state:

class CustomCell: UITableViewCell {
    @IBOutlet var headingLabel: UILabel!
    @IBOutlet var detailLabel: UILabel!


The controller would use the outlets to populate the cell's contents when a new cell is requested. In this example, row data is provided by dictionary instances containing "heading" and "detail" values for each cell:

override func tableView(_ tableView: UITableView, cellForRowAt indexPath: IndexPath) -> UITableViewCell {
    let row = rows[indexPath.row]

    let cell = tableView.dequeueReusableCell(withIdentifier: "customCell") as! CustomCell

    cell.headingLabel.text = row["heading"] as? String
    cell.detailLabel.text = row["detail"] as? String

    return cell

However, this design creates a tight coupling between the controller and the custom cell view. Any time the view class changes, the controller must also be updated.

MVVM Example

MVVM solves this problem by decoupling the view from the controller. Rather than exposing its implementation details via outlets, the view registers itself as an observer on the properties of the view model. Using this approach, the view and controller both become dependent on the view model, but neither is dependent on the other. As long as the view model doesn't change, either one can be modified without impact.

For example, the following markup shows a custom table view cell implemented using MarkupKit, an open-source framework for building native iOS and tvOS applications using a simple, HTML-like markup language. The cell contains two labels arranged vertically in a column:

    <UILabel class="label.heading" text="$content.heading"/>
    <UILabel class="label.detail" text="$content.detail"/>

Instead of outlets, the custom cell class exposes a content property representing the view model. The labels' text properties are bound to the properties of this object. Internally, MarkupKit uses key-value observing (KVO) to manage bindings:

class CustomCell: LMTableViewCell {
    // View model
    dynamic var content: [String: AnyObject]?


With the bindings established, the controller can be implemented as shown below. It simply dequeues a cell and sets its content property to the dictionary for the corresponding row. Because they are bound to the properties of the view model, the cell's labels are automatically updated to reflect the new values. No direct manipulation of view elements is required:

override func tableView(_ tableView: UITableView, cellForRowAt indexPath: IndexPath) -> UITableViewCell {
    let cell = tableView.dequeueReusableCell(withIdentifier: "customCell") as! CustomCell

    cell.content = rows[indexPath.row]

    return cell

Even if you're not using MarkupKit, you can still create bindings manually using KVO. For example:

class CustomCell: UITableViewCell {
    dynamic var row: [String: AnyObject]?

    let headingKeyPath = "row.heading"
    let detailKeyPath = "row.detail"

    override init(style: UITableViewCellStyle, reuseIdentifier: String?) {
        super.init(style: style, reuseIdentifier: reuseIdentifier)

        // Add observers
        addObserver(self, forKeyPath: headingKeyPath, options: [.initial, .new], context: nil)
        addObserver(self, forKeyPath: detailKeyPath, options: [.initial, .new], context: nil)

    required init?(coder decoder: NSCoder) {
        super.init(coder: decoder)

    deinit {
        // Remove observers
        removeObserver(self, forKeyPath: headingKeyPath)
        removeObserver(self, forKeyPath: detailKeyPath)

    override func observeValue(forKeyPath keyPath: String?, of object: Any?, change: [NSKeyValueChangeKey : Any]?, context: UnsafeMutableRawPointer?) {
        // Respond to changes
        let value = change?[.newKey] as? String

        switch keyPath! {
        case headingKeyPath:
            textLabel?.text = value

        case detailKeyPath:
            detailTextLabel?.text = value


However, in general, this approach will be much more verbose than using markup.


This article introduced the MVVM design pattern and provided an example of how it can be used to simplify the implementation of a custom table view cell. A complete example can be found here.

For more information, see the MarkupKit README.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s